Cleveland-Cliffs Q1: Tariff Tailwinds Meet Cold Reality
NEW YORK, April 26 —
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) managed to sell $4.9 billion worth of steel in Q1, and it still lost money doing it. The company's April 20 earnings filing revealed an $80 million hit from cold weather, and the stock promptly dropped 5% despite beating estimates on the loss. Wall Street's verdict was blunt: a narrower loss is still a loss.
- Q1 steel sales of $4.9B with an $80M cold-weather drag on results
- Gross margin negative at -2.9%, free cash flow at -$61M
- Analysts cut price targets to an average of $10.78, roughly 10% above the current $9.76 share price
The Cold Math
Three straight quarters of losses tell the story more clearly than any single print. Cleveland-Cliffs posted EPS of -$0.50, -$0.45, and -$0.43 over its last three reported periods. The trajectory is improving — technically — in the way that losing forty-three cents per share is better than losing fifty. Beating consensus in two of those quarters only underscores how low the bar has been set.
The real problem is structural. A -2.9% gross margin means the company loses money on steel before it pays a single executive, services a single bond, or runs a single ad. Revenue is $18.9 billion on a trailing basis, up 6.3% year over year. None of that top-line growth is reaching the bottom line. Free cash flow sits at negative $61 million. Cleveland-Cliffs moves enormous volumes of steel and somehow ends up with less cash than it started with.
The Tariff Bet
Then there is the other Cleveland-Cliffs story — the one that has nothing to do with quarterly earnings. Headlines point to a "transformative deal" tied to the Trump tariff regime, and the stock surged on that news alone. The bull case boils down to this: tariffs reshape the domestic steel landscape, Cleveland-Cliffs acts as a consolidator, and some combination of protected pricing and strategic M&A turns the margin picture around.
Jim Cramer called Cleveland-Cliffs "emblematic of the broader manufacturing economy." That is both a compliment and a warning. If the company is a proxy for American industrial policy, its fortunes depend less on how well it makes steel and more on whether tariff walls hold. That is a political bet dressed up as an equity thesis.
What the Street Thinks
Analysts responded to Q1 by cutting price targets to an average of $10.78. With shares at $9.76, that implies about 10% of upside — which for a stock this volatile barely covers a bad week. The forward P/E of 20.3x prices in a profit recovery that the income statement has not yet delivered. At a $5.57 billion market cap, investors are paying a steep premium for a steelmaker that cannot generate positive gross margins.
The 20x multiple only makes sense if margins are about to snap higher. Tariff protection could do that. A transformative acquisition could do that. But three quarters of negative EPS suggest the inflection has not arrived. And an $80 million cold-weather charge in a single quarter shows how exposed the cost structure remains to forces management cannot control.
The Insider Signal That Isn't
Insider filings from the last 90 days offer no conviction signal in either direction. Six directors each received grants of 15,334 shares on April 21, the day after the earnings filing. These are standard board compensation awards, not open-market purchases. No executive reached into a personal brokerage account and bought stock at $9.76. Nobody sold, either. The insider tape is flat.
For a stock where the bull case rests on a transformative deal, the absence of insider buying stands out. Directors who believed a major catalyst was imminent had every opportunity to accumulate shares in the single digits. They chose not to.
Where This Goes
Cleveland-Cliffs sits in a genuine tug-of-war. The tariff story offers real upside if deal speculation turns into signed agreements, and domestic steel pricing has structural support as long as the current trade policy holds. Against that: three quarters of losses, negative gross margins, negative free cash flow, and analyst targets that barely stretch above the current price.
The next checkpoint is whether the transformative deal rumors solidify into filings. Until then, the stock trades on headlines and hope — a fine setup for traders and a treacherous one for investors. The Q1 cold-weather hit is a reminder that even with favorable policy, Cleveland-Cliffs runs an operating model that buckles under ordinary disruptions.
Run the free Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. deep-dive →
Basis Report does not hold positions in securities discussed. This is not investment advice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Cleveland-Cliffs profitable in 2026?
Not yet. Cleveland-Cliffs carries a gross margin of -2.9% and posted three consecutive quarters of negative EPS. Free cash flow is -$61M on a trailing basis.
Why did CLF stock drop after Q1 earnings?
figure.
What is the Cleveland-Cliffs tariff deal?
Reports indicate Cleveland-Cliffs is pursuing a "transformative deal" linked to Trump-era tariff protections, which sent the stock surging. Specific deal terms have not been disclosed in filings as of this report.
What is the analyst price target for CLF?
Analysts cut their average price target to $10.78 following Q1 results, representing roughly 10% upside from the current $9.76 share price.
Are Cleveland-Cliffs insiders buying stock?
No open-market insider purchases or sales occurred in the last 90 days. The only activity was routine director share grants, signaling no strong conviction from management in either direction.