Cleveland-Cliffs Q1: Tariff Tailwinds Meet Cold Reality

NEW YORK, April 26 —

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) managed to sell $4.9 billion worth of steel in Q1, and it still lost money doing it. The company's April 20 earnings filing revealed an $80 million hit from cold weather, and the stock promptly dropped 5% despite beating estimates on the loss. The market's verdict was blunt: a narrower loss is still a loss.

The Cold Math

Three straight quarters of losses tell the story more clearly than any single print. Cleveland-Cliffs posted EPS of -$0.50, -$0.45, and -$0.43 over its last three reported periods. The trajectory is improving, technically, in the way that losing a dollar forty-three cents per share is better than losing a dollar fifty. Beating consensus in two of those quarters only underscores how low the bar has been set.

The real problem is structural. A -2.9% gross margin means the company is underwater before it pays a single executive, services a single bond, or runs a single ad. Revenue is $18.9 billion on a trailing basis, up 6.3% year over year, and none of that top-line growth is translating into profitability. Free cash flow sits at negative $61 million. Cleveland-Cliffs is a company that moves enormous volumes of steel and somehow ends up with less cash than it started with.

The Tariff Bet

Then there is the other Cleveland-Cliffs narrative, the one that has nothing to do with quarterly earnings. Headlines point to a "transformative deal" tied to the Trump tariff regime, and the stock surged on that news alone. This is the bull case distilled: tariffs reshape the domestic steel landscape, Cleveland-Cliffs is positioned as a consolidator, and some combination of protected pricing and strategic M&A turns the margin picture around.

Jim Cramer called Cleveland-Cliffs "emblematic of the broader manufacturing economy," which is both a compliment and a warning. If the company is a proxy for American industrial policy, then its fortunes depend less on operational execution and more on whether tariff walls hold. That is a political bet dressed up as an equity thesis.

What the Street Thinks

Analysts responded to Q1 by cutting price targets to an average of $10.78. With shares at $9.76, that implies about 10% of upside, which for a stock this volatile barely covers a bad week. The forward P/E of 20.3x prices in a recovery that the income statement has not yet delivered. At a $5.57 billion market cap, the market is paying a meaningful premium for a steelmaker that cannot generate positive gross margins.

The 20x multiple only makes sense if margins are about to inflect sharply. Tariff protection could do that. A transformative acquisition could do that. But three quarters of negative EPS suggest the inflection is not yet here, and cold weather hitting $80 million in a single quarter shows how exposed the cost structure remains to factors management cannot control.

The Insider Signal That Isn't

Insider filings from the last 90 days offer no conviction signal in either direction. Six directors each received grants of 15,334 shares on April 21, the day after the earnings filing. These are standard board compensation awards, not open-market purchases. No executive reached into a personal brokerage account and bought stock at $9.76. Nobody sold, either. The insider tape is a flatline.

For a stock where the bull case rests on a transformative deal, the absence of insider buying is notable. Directors who believed a major catalyst was imminent had every opportunity to accumulate shares in the single digits. They chose not to.

Where This Goes

Cleveland-Cliffs sits in a genuine tug-of-war. The tariff narrative offers real upside if deal speculation materializes into something concrete, and domestic steel pricing has structural support as long as the current trade policy holds. Against that: three quarters of losses, negative gross margins, negative free cash flow, and analyst targets that barely stretch above the current price.

The next checkpoint is whether the transformative deal rumors solidify into filings. Until then, the stock trades on headlines and hope, which is a fine environment for traders and a treacherous one for investors. The Q1 cold-weather hit is a reminder that even with favorable policy, Cleveland-Cliffs has an operating model that remains fragile in the face of ordinary disruptions.

Run the free Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. deep-dive →

Basis Report does not hold positions in securities discussed. This is not investment advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Cleveland-Cliffs profitable in 2026?

Not yet. As detailed above, Cleveland-Cliffs carries a gross margin of -2.9% and posted three consecutive quarters of negative EPS. Free cash flow is -$61M on a trailing basis.

Why did CLF stock drop after Q1 earnings?

Shares fell roughly 5% despite a narrower-than-expected loss. Per the analysis above, investors focused on weak profitability and an $80M one-time cold-weather cost hit rather than the revenue figure.

What is the Cleveland-Cliffs tariff deal?

Reports indicate Cleveland-Cliffs is pursuing a "transformative deal" linked to Trump-era tariff protections, which sent the stock surging. Specific deal terms have not been disclosed in filings as of this report.

What is the analyst price target for CLF?

Analysts cut their average price target to $10.78 following Q1 results, representing roughly 10% upside from the current $9.76 share price, as discussed in the report above.

Are Cleveland-Cliffs insiders buying stock?

No open-market insider purchases or sales occurred in the last 90 days. The only activity was routine director share grants, which signals no strong conviction from management in either direction.