Free tool · No signup · Enter any 6 numbers from any annual report
Earnings Quality Score
Not all earnings are equal. Enter six numbers from any annual report — GAAP net income, adjusted net income, operating cash flow, DSO for two years, and whether the company had restructuring charges. Get a 0–100 earnings quality score across four dimensions, with plain-English interpretation for each. Works for any company, any country.
Enter financials
Profitability
Days Sales Outstanding
DSO = (Accounts Receivable ÷ Revenue) × 365
Charges
Earnings Quality Score
Enter financials to score earnings quality
Input values from any annual report. Four dimensions scored entirely in your browser — no signup, no API calls.
How the Earnings Quality Score Is Calculated
The Scoring Signals
- Cash Conversion (CFO / Net Income) — measures how well reported profit converts to operating cash. Ratios above 1.0 mean conservative accounting.
- GAAP vs Adjusted Gap — gap between audited GAAP earnings and the adjusted figure. Gaps above 25% signal significant recurring exclusions.
- Revenue Quality (DSO Trend) — rising Days Sales Outstanding means revenue grows faster than cash collections, a classic revenue recognition risk signal.
- Recurring Non-Recurring Charges — restructuring charges appearing annually are effectively operating costs, systematically inflating adjusted EPS.
- FCF / Net Income Ratio — free cash flow relative to net income. Measures capital efficiency and the sustainability of reported earnings.
- Accruals Ratio (Sloan Signal) — high-accrual firms underperform by ~10%/yr as accounting entries revert to cash reality (Sloan 1996).
- AR vs Revenue Growth — accounts receivable growing faster than revenue flags aggressive revenue booking ahead of collections.
- Gross Margin Trend — deteriorating margins signal cost pressure or pricing erosion not yet reflected in headline EPS.
Manual mode scores 4 signals (25 pts each) from numbers you enter. Ticker mode auto-scores 5 dimensions from SEC EDGAR. Both produce a normalised 0–100 composite — missing signals are excluded from the denominator, not penalised.
Score Ranges
Composite formula: Each scored signal contributes equally within its mode. The raw total is divided by the maximum possible (based on signals with available data) and multiplied by 100. This means a three-signal partial score is still comparable to a four-signal full score — both represent the quality of available information, not a penalised subset.
Want the full picture?
Earnings quality is one dimension. Get a complete equity research report covering valuation, competitive positioning, risk factors, and capital allocation — generated in under 60 seconds.
Generate a free report →Grade capital allocation next
Earnings quality tells you if profits are real. Capital allocation tells you if management deploys those profits wisely — ROIC vs WACC, buyback quality, dividend coverage, and M&A discipline.
Open Capital Allocation Grader →What an earnings quality score measures and why it matters
An earnings quality score tells you whether a company's reported profits reflect real economic performance — or whether accounting choices are flattering the numbers. Two companies can both report $5 earnings per share, but if one converts 95% of that to operating cash flow while the other converts only 40%, they are not equally profitable. The first company earned cash; the second earned an accounting opinion.
This matters because low-quality earnings tend to mean-revert. A company reporting strong GAAP earnings but weak cash flow conversion scores poorly because the gap between accruals and cash is unsustainable — eventually, uncollected receivables become write-offs, aggressive revenue recognition gets restated, and recurring “non-recurring” charges erode the adjusted narrative. Richard Sloan's accrual anomaly research showed that high-accrual firms underperform low-accrual firms by roughly 10% annually as this reversion plays out. For retail investors evaluating an earnings beat, the quality score answers the question that matters most: did the company actually generate cash, or just generate a number?
The scorer evaluates four dimensions — cash conversion (CFO vs. net income), the GAAP-to-adjusted earnings gap, Days Sales Outstanding trends (whether the company is collecting what it books), and recurring non-recurring charges. Each dimension is scored 0–25 for a 100-point total. Scores above 75 indicate conservative, cash-backed earnings. Scores below 50 mean at least two dimensions have meaningful concerns — anchor your valuation to cash flow, not EPS. Use the output alongside the earnings quality checklist for a complete quarterly analysis, or read the 15 earnings red flags guide to learn what patterns the score is designed to catch.
How to use this earnings quality scorer
Find the three profitability numbers
Open the annual report or earnings press release. Find GAAP net income (bottom of the income statement), adjusted or non-GAAP net income (from the reconciliation table in the earnings release), and operating cash flow (first section of the cash flow statement). Enter them in millions.
Calculate DSO for two years
Days Sales Outstanding = (Accounts Receivable ÷ Revenue) × 365. Find accounts receivable on the balance sheet and revenue on the income statement. Do this for both the current year and prior year. A rising DSO means revenue is being recognised faster than cash is being collected — a key quality signal.
Note restructuring charges
Check the income statement for restructuring, impairment, or special charges. Toggle Yes if any appear. The concern isn't one genuine restructuring — it's companies that report these charges every single year. Annual restructuring charges are effectively an operating cost the company chooses not to include in adjusted EPS.
Read the score and share
The tool calculates a 0–100 score across four dimensions (25 points each). Green means high quality. Yellow means mixed — investigate specific red dimensions before relying on reported EPS. Red means significant concern. Hit Share to save the URL — all your inputs are encoded in the link so you can return to it or send it to a colleague.
Understanding your earnings quality score
What Is Earnings Quality?
Earnings quality measures the degree to which reported net income reflects true economic performance. High-quality earnings are backed by operating cash flow, recurring by nature, and not inflated by one-time accounting benefits. Low-quality earnings show the opposite: a widening gap between net income and cash flow, growing accrual balances, and aggressive revenue recognition that books sales before cash arrives.
The distinction matters because GAAP earnings are built on accounting assumptions — depreciation schedules, revenue timing, warranty reserves. Cash flow is binary: you either collected it or you didn't. Investors who anchor valuation to earnings without checking quality are exposed to mean-reversion risk as inflated figures correct toward cash reality.
How the Score Is Calculated
The scorer evaluates five dimensions, each worth 0–20 points for a 100-point total. FCF/Net Income ratio measures how much of reported profit converts to free cash flow — the most direct quality test. Accruals ratio quantifies the portion of earnings driven by accounting entries rather than collected cash.
Gross margin stability signals pricing power durability: eroding margins suggest cost pressure not yet reflected in EPS. Revenue growth consistency identifies whether revenue advances at a sustainable pace or lumps in ways that suggest pull-forward recognition. R&D-to-revenue trajectory measures whether innovation spending rises proportionally with growth — a signal of reinvestment discipline across all five dimensions.
What Makes a High-Quality Earnings Report
A score of 75 or above indicates cash-backed earnings with consistent margins and low accrual ratios — a foundation you can anchor valuation to with confidence. Scores between 50 and 74 signal mixed quality: at least one dimension shows meaningful divergence from cash reality, typically elevated accruals or a shrinking FCF/Net Income ratio.
Before relying on reported EPS for valuation, check which dimension pulls the score down and read the cash flow statement for confirmation. Scores below 50 indicate earnings likely overstated relative to economic reality — in at least two dimensions, reported profits are running ahead of cash. At this level, anchor valuation to operating cash flow, not EPS.
Compare Two Stocks Side by Side
Comparison mode pre-loads two tickers using the URL pattern ?compare=TICKER1,TICKER2 — for example, /tools/earnings-quality-score?compare=MSFT,GOOGL. Enter two tickers in the comparison fields and the tool fetches five dimensions from SEC EDGAR for each company, then declares a winner per dimension with an overall verdict.
This is most useful before an earnings release, when you want to know which competitor enters the quarter with the stronger earnings quality foundation. Companies with high scores carry less revision risk when accruals eventually reverse. Share the comparison URL directly — no screenshot needed, full context in one link.
What each dimension measures
Cash conversion: earnings are an opinion, cash is a fact
Operating Cash Flow / GAAP Net Income is the most direct measure of whether reported profits are backed by real cash. Net income is constructed from accounting choices — depreciation rates, revenue recognition timing, warranty accruals, pension assumptions. Each is legitimate, but each creates room to manage the number. Cash flow doesn't: you either collected the cash or you didn't.
A ratio above 1.0 means the company generates more cash than it reports in profit — conservative accounting. Below 0.6 means most of the reported earnings are accrual-based and not yet collected. Negative operating cash flow with positive net income is one of the clearest red flags in financial analysis.
GAAP vs adjusted gap: what are they adjusting away?
Most companies now report two sets of earnings: GAAP (the legally required, audited number) and "adjusted" or "non-GAAP" (the management-preferred number with certain costs removed). Stock compensation, amortisation of acquired intangibles, and restructuring charges are the most common exclusions.
A small GAAP/adjusted gap (<5%) is routine and usually legitimate. A large gap (>25%) means management is excluding significant, recurring costs from the number it uses to communicate performance to investors. The acid test: would a private equity buyer accept these adjustments when valuing the company? If not, the adjusted number is misleading. Full guide: GAAP vs. adjusted earnings →
DSO trend: are they collecting what they're booking?
Days Sales Outstanding = (Accounts Receivable / Revenue) × 365. It measures how long, on average, a company waits to collect payment after booking revenue. A rising DSO means the company is recognising revenue faster than it's collecting cash — a classic signal of aggressive revenue recognition or loosening credit standards.
The trend matters more than the absolute level. An absolute DSO of 60 days is normal in some industries; a jump from 40 to 55 days in a single year is a signal worth investigating regardless of industry. Channel stuffing — shipping goods to distributors that haven't sold them — typically shows up as a sudden DSO spike before a revenue reversal.
Non-recurring charges: the ones that recur every year
One genuine restructuring charge — a factory closure, a major acquisition integration — is a legitimate event. The problem is companies that report restructuring, impairment, or "special" charges year after year, every year. At that point, the charge is no longer non-recurring: it's an operating cost the company has decided not to include in its adjusted earnings narrative.
Research has consistently shown that companies with recurring "non-recurring" charges see their adjusted EPS revert toward GAAP EPS over time, as analysts and investors ultimately demand accountability for the excluded costs. Treating these charges as permanent adjustments systematically overstates sustainable earnings power.
Why earnings quality predicts future returns
Richard Sloan's 1996 study found that investors systematically overprice high-accrual firms. The market fixates on EPS and fails to correctly value the cash vs. accrual split within that EPS. High-accrual firms mean-revert — the market eventually reprices as accruals unwind — producing returns roughly 10% below low-accrual firms annually. This Sloan Accrual Anomaly is one of the most robustly replicated findings in academic finance.
The same logic applies to GAAP/adjusted gaps: firms with persistently large gaps tend to see multiple compression as investors eventually price in the excluded costs. Earnings quality is a forward-looking signal, not just a backward-looking audit.
How to use earnings quality alongside valuation
Earnings quality is a filter, not a buy/sell signal. A low score means you should be sceptical of reported EPS — it doesn't automatically mean the stock is overvalued. A company with poor earnings quality might still be cheap on a P/FCF or EV/EBITDA basis if the market has already priced in the concerns.
Use the score to calibrate confidence in your valuation inputs. High earnings quality = apply multiples to reported EPS with confidence. Low earnings quality = anchor valuation to operating cash flow, not EPS. The lower the earnings quality, the wider the range of outcomes you should model.
Frequently asked questions
What is the Earnings Quality Score?
The Earnings Quality Score is a 0–100 composite rating that measures how well a company's reported net income reflects real economic value. It evaluates multiple dimensions — cash flow conversion, accrual ratios, revenue collection trends, and the persistence of 'non-recurring' charges — to detect whether reported profits are backed by actual cash or inflated by accounting estimates. Scores of 70 or above indicate conservative, cash-backed earnings. Scores below 40 flag significant divergence between reported profits and cash reality, meaning investors should anchor valuation to operating cash flow rather than EPS.
What makes earnings high quality?
High-quality earnings share three characteristics: (1) they convert to operating cash flow at a ratio above 1.0 — meaning the company collects more cash than it reports as profit; (2) the gap between GAAP earnings and management's preferred adjusted figure is small (under 10%), indicating few recurring costs are excluded from the headline number; and (3) Days Sales Outstanding is stable or declining — revenue is being collected at the pace it's recognized. High-quality earnings also have low accrual ratios, meaning the income statement reflects actual cash transactions rather than accounting estimates about future collections.
How is accruals ratio used in the score?
The accruals ratio measures the portion of reported earnings that exist as accounting entries rather than collected cash. It is calculated as (Net Income − Operating Cash Flow) / Total Assets. A high accrual ratio means profits are driven by accounting assumptions — depreciation schedules, revenue recognition timing, warranty reserves — rather than actual cash. Richard Sloan's 1996 study found that high-accrual firms systematically underperform low-accrual firms by roughly 10% per year as accruals eventually reverse. In ticker mode, the Earnings Quality Scorer fetches this signal directly from SEC EDGAR filings and scores it as one of five dimensions.
What score means a stock is a red flag?
A score below 40 indicates significant earnings quality concerns — at least two dimensions show meaningful divergence between reported profits and cash reality. At this level, reported EPS likely overstates sustainable earnings power. Common causes: negative operating cash flow alongside positive net income, a GAAP-to-adjusted gap above 25%, rapidly rising Days Sales Outstanding, or restructuring charges appearing every year. For stocks scoring below 40, anchor valuation to operating cash flow or free cash flow rather than EPS, and widen your uncertainty range in any DCF model.
How often should I check earnings quality?
Check earnings quality at each new annual report (10-K filing) — this is when full-year figures for cash flow, accruals, and DSO are available. For quarterly monitoring, watch for rising DSO trends and widening GAAP-to-adjusted gaps in 10-Q filings, as these often signal deterioration before the annual picture is clear. For US-listed stocks, use the 'Score a Stock' mode to automatically pull the latest SEC EDGAR data. Set a filing alert on this tool to be notified when the next 10-K or 10-Q drops.